Richard Dawkins 2007.04.23 O'Reilly Factor

	Duration: 05:42 minutes Upload Time: 07-04-24 00:16:34 User: stevev1 :::: Favorites
Description: Richard Dawkins 2007.04.23 O'Reilly Factor
Comments
usernamedarwin ::: Favorites Dude, you need to check the facts. There is ZERO historical evidence for Jesus existing. For years Josephus was the only record and that turned out to be a phoney source. Even if there was a real Jesus person, we only know of him through translated and re-translated urban legends. For Bill to say casually he was a 'real guy' like someone he met in the bar is ludicrious. einstein, Darwin, Newton, DAWKINS: these are 'real guys.' 07-08-27 20:35:37 _____________________________________________________
joe19912 ::: Favorites Billo can't go 2 mins without a lie. Hitler's Army had "God is with us" imprinted on their belt buckles. I know it isn't that simple, but I don't have room for more comment. Just assume if Billo's lips are moving, it's B.S. 07-08-27 14:56:26 _____________________________________________________
x9one9x ::: Favorites "All religions are valid, NONE are literal." -Joseph Campbell ...Stop arguing over the absurd literalism of religious belief. It's masturbation. RELIGIONS ARE MYTHS/METAPHORS. People who interpret their religious books as literal fact are ignorant bigots. Wake up. 07-08-27 13:37:57 _____________________________________________________
6scarface6 ::: Favorites Dawkins is a genius, Bill-O is a retard. But at least he wasn't using the YOU'RE WRONG I'M RIGHT SO I'M NOT GOING TO LET YOU TALK BY SHOUTING OVER YOU approach to debating like he usually does. 07-08-27 03:02:29 _____________________________________________________
ovenmit4lyfe ::: Favorites unfortunately, I think bill is right here. If you can come up with a reason as to how life came to be, let me hear it. everthing here on earth is so well put together, I dont think it is merely by chance. 07-08-27 07:27:33 _____________________________________________________
malaflam ::: Favorites There is a difference between chance and 3 billion plus years of the universe and life evolving. 07-08-27 10:34:27 _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
simmonster ::: Favorites You ask for a reason as to how life came to be...well, no offense but read a book. "The Selfish Gene" by Dawkins would be a good place to start. Everything on earth is 'so well put together' because it has been working itself out for longer than we can even imagine. Humans have only been here for a cosmic blink of an eye. also. There is really nothing more enraging than Bill O'Reilly and all his bullheaded idiocy. 07-08-27 10:51:43 _____________________________________________________
primusfeces ::: Favorites both are 100% wrong...aethism is not science and religon is a just a system of control...intellengent anarchy is the way to go.... if everyone was educated to the same degree and we could all just communicated better the world would be much better...but thats just is my utopia. 07-08-27 02:17:06 _____________________________________________________
expatcatalyst ::: Favorites The founding fathers were haevily influenced by and incorporated many of the ideas that became the USA into the starter documents for this country. To include the Declaration of Independence, Constitution etc.... Also as I have said elsewhere, it doesn't matter if we agree to stop rebelling against the truth, it all turns out the same, every knee get's bent in the end. 07-08-27 02:05:45 _____________________________________________________
usernamedarwin ::: Favorites Washington never once mentioned Jesus in his thousands of letters (which Bill has read). Jefferson believed in science and material ism, he considered himself a 'sect by myself.' Madison(father of the consititution) railed against religion in his Memorial and Remonstrance against Religious Assessments and has no conventional sense of Christianity. Franklin abhored Christianity and declared 'my own mind is my church.' Who are you talking about? 07-08-27 20:44:32 _____________________________________________________
expatcatalyst ::: Favorites If Christianity had no influence how do you explain that George Whitfield befriended men like Benjamin Franklin, converted men like Patrick Henry, and inspired men like George Washington. ....Whitefield ... even accompanied Benjamin Franklin to make the American case in the Court of St. James. 07-08-27 22:00:25 _____________________________________________________
expatcatalyst ::: Favorites I would say that is some pretty heavy duty "Christian Inluence". Why is Christian Influence always considered bad now? Those people we call the "religious right" aren't the message. The message is the sacrifice made by Jesus and like I have repeatedly said here, no matter our rebelion against that, every knee will bow.... 07-08-27 22:01:46 _____________________________________________________
ovenmit4lyfe ::: Favorites this is the ONLY subject I agree with old Bill. I too think the probability of life is far to large to be coincidental. 07-08-27 01:27:30 _____________________________________________________
expatcatalyst ::: Favorites Referring to the maker of the universe, as it's been done for literally thousands of years is hardly something you could call stupid. It's out of respect and awe at something that is way too awesome for us, even here where glib and accusatory are the watchwords of the day. As mentioned here a couple of times, we don't have to give up our rebellion towards G_d, but the outcome is the same......... 07-08-27 01:19:39 _____________________________________________________
Persian5life ::: Favorites you can worship my toothbrush as a god and let me say this i don't give a shits!, as long as you keep your beliefs to yourself i am happy. 07-08-27 01:12:08 _____________________________________________________
jerryaltman ::: Favorites IF RELIGION PEOPLE REALLY BELIEVE IN GOD, 100%, THEY WOULD NOT BE AFRAID OF ATHEIST. IF SOCIETY BELIVE IN GOD, ABOUT 90%, WHY 50% OF PEOPLE ARE UNFAITHFUL?? WOULD A CRIMINAL STEAL A BANK IF POLICE WOULD SURELY KILL HIN? SURE NOT. IF GOD SEE EVERYTHING, AND PEOPLE BELIVE IN HIS PUNHSMENTS, WHY THEY DO TOSE THINGS? cAUSE THEY DON'T REALLY BELIEVE, BUT WANT TO BELIVE DUE FEAR DEAD. 07-08-26 23:57:04 _____________________________________________________
ovenmit4lyfe ::: Favorites ...what?... 07-08-27 01:20:08 _____________________________________________________
jerryaltman ::: Favorites What I mesn is: Why religion people do so much worng things, wrong even to their own religion, if they belive God punshment is very cruel, like hell? If there was a guy pointing a gun to somebody's head, ready to shot if he do anything wrong, he would not do anything wrong. That's why I believe people don't really believe in GOd, but just want to believe, sice they don't accept dead. The ones who reallybelive are the extreme fanatics, and they are what they are, fanatics. 07-08-27 01:31:00 _____________________________________________________
6scarface6 ::: Favorites ...again... what? 07-08-27 02:59:23 _____________________________________________________
wafflekaffe ::: Favorites Dawkins is a genius and a world treasure, and O'Reilly is a bully, a liar, and a right wing propagandist. I can't imagine what would make Dawkins want to appear on his show. 07-08-26 23:41:37 _____________________________________________________